The Best Alternatives to Traditional Excel-Based Test Tracking

by Thijs Kok, on November 5, 2025

Summary: Excel’s flexibility in test tracking quickly turns into chaos as projects grow—causing version conflicts, security risks, and poor traceability—so teams aiming for scalable, efficient QA should move to purpose-built test management tools like TestMonitor, which provide structure, collaboration, and real-time visibility without the overhead of spreadsheets.


If you’ve been in quality assurance (QA) for more than a minute, chances are you’ve tracked tests in Excel at some point. 

It’s familiar, flexible, and deceptively simple. 

Drop in some rows, add a few formulas, and voilà—you’ve got a “system.”

But the cracks show quickly. 

One person formats a column differently. Another copies the file to their desktop. A critical bug note gets buried in cell J47. What started as order soon devolves into version chaos, weak security, and reporting that feels like duct tape. And although Excel may be free, the cost of missed defects, manual workarounds, and wasted time stacks up fast.

It’s not that spreadsheets are useless. They’re just not built for structured, collaborative testing. Fortunately, there are numerous alternatives designed to make testing faster, clearer, and significantly less stressful.

What Are the Hidden Costs of Excel Test Tracking? 

Before exploring alternatives, it’s worth outlining why Excel falls short as projects scale. Excel, as we noted, is great at a lot of things, but when it comes to test tracking, you may run into:

  • A lack of control and structure: Anyone can change a format or overwrite a cell. Multiply that by a team of testers and you get clutter, inconsistency, and missing traceability.
  • Security risks: Password protection in Word or Excel can be cracked in minutes with free software. Sensitive project data deserves more than a paper lock.
  • Inefficient workflows: Scattered versions across email threads, thumb drives, or network folders slow everything down. By the time you’ve found the “right” sheet, the test run has moved on.
  • Limited reporting: Excel crunches numbers brilliantly, but aggregating results across multiple sheets or providing a real-time testing overview? Not so much.
  • Auditing nightmares: Convincing an auditor of data integrity with a patchwork of confusingly named files is as painful as it sounds.

For small projects, Excel may feel “good enough.” But for growing teams and serious QA processes, the gaps become liabilities.

Explore These Alternative Test Tracking Tools That Fit the Job

Professional QA, especially at scale, requires moving away from Excel and choosing tools that bring structure where you need it most. 

Here are some categories to consider.

1. Project Management Platforms (for Teams Needing More Than a Spreadsheet)

For teams not ready to go all-in on a dedicated test management tool, project management platforms centralize work, streamline collaboration, and keep projects visible.

Some options you’ll see as you begin your search include: 

  • Airtable: Familiar spreadsheet feel with database power underneath.
  • Smartsheet: Project management principles layered with testing workflows.
  • Monday.com: A clean, intuitive interface with automation to reduce manual busywork.
  • Notion: A flexible, all-in-one workspace—great for small projects in which testing is just one piece of the puzzle.
  • ClickUp: Strong integration potential (including with TestMonitor) and customizable workflows.

These tools bring order, but they’re generalists. 

For teams who live and breathe testing, a specialized solution goes further.

2. Dedicated Test Management Tools (for Teams Needing Granular Control)

Purpose-built platforms tackle the complexities of QA directly. They centralize test cases, enable traceability, and connect seamlessly to development workflows.

A few names you’ll see in the market include:

  • TestRail: A cloud-based classic for managing user acceptance testing at scale.
  • Jira and Azure DevOps: Strong choices if you’re already locked into Atlassian or Microsoft ecosystems.
  • Qase, PractiTest, Testmo: Modern, specialized test management platforms offering robust functionality and integrations.

These tools give structure and reporting depth, but some can feel complex or rigid, especially for teams balancing manual and automated efforts.

TestMonitor for Simplified Test Management

TestMonitor was built for testers who want clarity without compromise. It takes the powerful structure of a dedicated tool and delivers it with a visual, intuitive interface—the perfect pivot from fragmented spreadsheets. It directly solves the pitfalls of Excel-based tracking with:

  • Simplified workflows: Import, export, and prepare test data in minutes, keeping each phase moving forward.
  • Centralized data: Access one hub for all test runs—past, present, and planned. No more chasing versions across drives or inboxes.
  • Superior reporting: Gain real-time insights into status, traceability, and progress. Managers get the full picture without another custom pivot table.

A test phase can be “spun up” in minutes with Excel, but the ongoing overhead of managing it quickly outpaces any savings. TestMonitor is designed to reduce that drag and make quality measurable, visible, and actionable.

Frequently Asked Questions About Alternatives to Excel-Based Test Tracking

Ready to Leave Excel Behind?

Spreadsheets have had their moment. For modern QA, there are better ways. 

From project management platforms to dedicated test tools, the options are strong. And for teams who want structure, usability, and powerful reporting in one, TestMonitor offers a clear path forward.

Don’t let hidden costs and scattered files slow down your testing. 

Schedule a TestMonitor demo today and see how much smoother test tracking can be.

Thijs Kok's photo

Written by Thijs Kok

Thijs Kok is Lead Software Developer at TestMonitor. From the first line of code, he helped shape the product—leading a team that built it from the ground up. With a background in Information Science and 16+ years of experience in software testing, usability, and product design, he blends technical depth with a strong user focus. He believes “good programmers write code for humans first and computers next,” a principle that guides his work. Thijs is passionate about creating software that’s intuitive, effective, and enjoyable to use.

Want the latest news, tips and advice in next-level software testing? Subscribe to our blog!